I built this page in hopes to standardize the L2-Wing technique.
an L2 wing is constructed using grouped or none grouped candidates from 2 digits containing a minimal of three strong-links.
{note: a 4th strong-link may be noted at a weak-link interface, this occurs from arrangement of the box's,row,cols used}
a generalized L2-wing is possible expansion removes the three strong-link restraint through the weak-link via additional strong-links on one candidate.
if these are used the designation gL- Wing is warranted.
information Ive located originally identified L2 -wings and L-3 wings; however L3 wings directly overlap another solving technique {hybrid wings} and use 3 candidates Ive excluded these types;
- Code: Select all
L3-Wing: (X)a = (X - Y)b = (Y-Z)c = (Z)d "a" and "d" in same unit; a<>Z, d<>X
H1-Wing: (X)a = (X - Y)b = (Y-Z)c = (Z)d "a" and "d" in same unit; a<>Z, d<>X
Which leaves only 1 scenario: the L2-wing which can be read in two directions,
L-Wing: (X)a = (X)b - (X)c = (X-Y)d = (Y)e =>> "a" and "e" in same unit; a<>Y, e<>X
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ { or } ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L2 -Wing: (Y)e = (Y -X)d = (X)c -(x)b = (x)a =>> "a" and "e" in same unit; a<>Y, e<>X
L2-Wings are classed by two types :
Type 1: none grouped candidates {all strong links} so that any Box,Row,and Col sector can be used for any of the three strong links: for simplicity I'll only list an exemplar instead of generating all possible base type configurations.
Type 2: grouped candidates where by weakly linked candidates become strong links, so that a limited selection of combinations can be used for any of the three strong links, for simplicity I'll only list a few exemplars instead of generating all base type configurations.
- Code: Select all
Type 1: None Grouped Candidates: (X)Col 2,8, (Y) Box 9 ->>
--------------------------------------
| . / . | . . . | . / . |
| . x . | . . . | . x . |
| . / . | . . . | . / . |
--------------------------------------
| . / . | . . . | . / . |
| . / . | . . . | . / . |
| . / . | . . . | . / . |
--------------------------------------
| . / . | . . . | / xy+ / |
| . x-y . | . . . | / / y-x |
| . / . | . . . | / / / |
--------------------------------------
- Code: Select all
Type 2: Grouped candidates (X)Col 2,3 (Y) Col 3 Type 2a: Grouped Candidates (X) Box 6,Row 1 (Y) Col 4
-------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
| . x x | . . . | . . . | | / / / | xy+ / / | x / / |
| . x x | . . . | . . . | | . . . | / . . | . . . |
| . x x | . . . | . . . | | . . . | / . . | . . . |
-------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
| . / / | . . . | . . . | | . . . | / . . | x / / |
| . / xy+ | . . . | . . . | | . . . | / . . | x / / |
| . / / | . . . | . . . | | . . . | y-x . . | x x-y / |
-------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
| . / y | . . . | . . . | | . . . | / . . | . . . |
| . x-y y | . . . | . . . | | . . . | / . . | . . . |
| . / y | . . . | . . . | | . . . | / . . | . . . |
-------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
- Code: Select all
Type 2b: Grouped candidates (X) Row2,8 (Y)Box 1
----------------------------------
| . . . | / y / | . . . |
| / / / | / y xy | / x / |
| . . . | / y / | . . . |
----------------------------------
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
----------------------------------
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| / / / | / x-y / | / x / |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
----------------------------------
- 'XY+' means the cell must contain both 'X' and 'Y' candidates, and possibly others
'-X' means 'X' is eliminated
'-Y' means 'Y' is eliminated
'/' indicates cell is devoid of candidate 'X' or 'Y' depending on which candidate is using that sector, for clarity Candidate Sectors is included at the top of the exemplar.